I don't get it

Why is the back ground of the man important, but the woman not? I mean seriously, we know the last promotion date of the gunnery sergeant, but what about the woman? Why would the reporter spend so much time describing the back ground of the man involved in the crash, but think that the back ground of the woman was unimportant?

I think I know why... She is obviously an islamist extremist who works for the local Democrat party, and is used to spending all her time in a drunken stupor, while as for the marine it was probably out of character or something. That they were both riding the bike naked... Obviously they were fleeing tea party protesters or KKK rally attendees... wait... those are one in the same... never mind.

Anyway, why do those in the media find it so important to point out when a serviceman screws up, but avoid labeling anyone a Muslim or a democrat? I mean his profession was mentioned in the second sentence of the article. Contrast that with the religious affiliation of Nadal Hasan at Ft. Hood... No mention of his Islamic ties in a two page article... Pretty disgusting, but then again what else can you expect from the people who got this guy elected?

Me