I don't get it

Why is the back ground of the man important, but the woman not? I mean seriously, we know the last promotion date of the gunnery sergeant, but what about the woman? Why would the reporter spend so much time describing the back ground of the man involved in the crash, but think that the back ground of the woman was unimportant?

I think I know why... She is obviously an islamist extremist who works for the local Democrat party, and is used to spending all her time in a drunken stupor, while as for the marine it was probably out of character or something. That they were both riding the bike naked... Obviously they were fleeing tea party protesters or KKK rally attendees... wait... those are one in the same... never mind.

Anyway, why do those in the media find it so important to point out when a serviceman screws up, but avoid labeling anyone a Muslim or a democrat? I mean his profession was mentioned in the second sentence of the article. Contrast that with the religious affiliation of Nadal Hasan at Ft. Hood... No mention of his Islamic ties in a two page article... Pretty disgusting, but then again what else can you expect from the people who got this guy elected?

Me

Hottest of the hotties

Yes, Conservative women just make me go schwing! Especially this one, but right wing news does not know who she is so I can not hold that against them. I would have ordered them differently, and think that Skye is out of place, but compared to those across the aisle... just yeah...

I think that Lila and Orit would have been higher up on my list as I like brunettes over blondes, but that is just me. It is really hard to rate women that have this much depth to them. Who can say who is hotter than the next? Not me. Wish the left had anything that compared.

BTW, I am not counting Hollywood in this, as yes there are beautiful actors, but there tends to be little depth to them. Among those I would consider intellectuals, there is not much competition between left and right.

Audi!

Me